Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13047 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2025 Thana- PATEPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raj Kumar Son of Nagendra Rai, Resident of village Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No.212 of 2025 instituted under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 303(2), 74, 329(3), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioner having armed with weapons came at the house of informant and started assaulting him with intention to kill due to which he got injured. It is alleged that when his wife and father came to rescue him, all the accused persons assaulted them also causing injury to them. It is further alleged that accused persons snatched gold chain from the neck of his wife.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner and informant both are the own brothers and there is land dispute between them. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13047 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 submits that the injuries to the injured are simple in nature. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Ram Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Court concerned. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner as well as his clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateXIII, Vaishali at Hajipur/ concerned Court in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No.212 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T