Anuj Kumar @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26776 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Anuj Kumar @ Ravi Son of Sri Ravindra Yadav, Resident of VillageBara Faridpur, P.S.- Kurtha, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 26776 of 2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.58 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 413, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of one motorcycle from his hosue.

Submission of the learned counsel or the petitioner is that as a matter of fact the main accused is Gauri Shankar Singh and he used to steal the motorcycle and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because the motorcycle was kept in his house. It is further submitted that except the present case, he is accused in one more case. The petitioner is in custody for more than four months and another co-accused person has been granted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26776 of 2017 (3) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 bail including the main accused, vide order dated 30.5.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.24685 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad (Kalpa) P.S.Case No.58 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(ii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iii) In future, if his acidification is found in similar type of cases, his bail bond shall automatically be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U