← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16327/2024dismissed

Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-19Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16327 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2022 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Kunal Kumar Son of Nand Kishore Singh @ Nand Kishore Kumar Resident of Village- Dighi Kala West, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Ambastha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-04-2024 This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 153 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 20(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

4. Pursuant to the order dated 1.3.2024, report of the District Judge, Vaishali has been received regarding the stage of trial of the cases pending against the petitioner and the same is as follows:- Sr. No.

Name of Court Case No.

Stage of Case 1.

ADJ-III Hajipur Sadar 663 of 2021 (S.Tr. No. 207 of 2024).

Appearance

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16327 of 2024(3) dt.19-04-2024 2/2 2.

ADJ-IV Hajipur Sadar 710 of 2021.

(S.Tr. No. 710 of 2021).

Evidence 3.

ADJ-cum-Exclusive Spl. Excise Court No. 1 Hajipur Sadar 229 of 2018.

(Excise G.R. 1584 of 2018).

Appearance 4.

CJM Hajipur Sadar 153 of 2022 (GR 643 of 2022).

Appearance from Custody 5.

ACJM-VII Hajipur Town 51 of 2018 (GR 328 of 2018).

Police Paper 6.

ACJM-VII Bidupur P.S. 35 of 2018 (GR 742 of 2018).

Evidence

5. The petitioner is in custody since 2.3.2022.

6. Since the petitioner is facing trial in six cases, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

8. The Court below is again directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner in all the cases and conclude the same at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U T