Asmina Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14054 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2024 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Asmina Khatoon D/o Md. Ramjani Ansari @ Ramjani Momin R/o VillageSirsiya Bazar, Ward No.12, PS- Bela, Dist- Sitamarhi 2.
Tabila Khatun @ Rahbila Khatoon W/o Md. Ramjani Ansari @ Ramjani Momin R/o Village- Sirsiya Bazar, Ward No.12, PS- Bela, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 167 of 2024 dated 09.07.2024 registered under Sections 103(1), 108(1), 351(1) of B.N.S.
3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners for the second time, inasmuch as the earlier anticipatory bail application of the petitioners was rejected on merits by this Court vide order dated 10.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 80550 of 2024.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequently regular bail has been granted to the accused, namely Ramjani Ansari, by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 25.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 69593 of 2025. Accordingly, petitioners have preferred this application for second time.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14054 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026 2/2
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that anticipatory bail application of the petitioners was earlier rejected by this Court on merits, having regard to the gravity of the offence, I do not find any reason to grant anticipatory bail on the present petition filed by the petitioners for the second time.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is rejected.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Siwani/- U T