Indrajeet Kumar Yadav @ Indrajeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26829 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -ASHOK PAPER MILL District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Indrajeet Kumar Yadav @ Indrajeet Yadav, Son of Late Tun Tun Yadav @ Tuntun Yadav, resident of Village- Brahmotra, P.S. Ashok Paper Mill, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rohit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ashok Paper Mill P.S.Case No.8 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 22 (b) of N.D.P.S.Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 01 kg. and 200 gram Ganja from the house of the petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has clean antecedent and nothing has been recovered from his possession. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody for about six months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26829 of 2017 (2) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Darbhanga in connection with Ashok Paper Mill P.S.Case No.8 of 2017 dated 25.01.2017 giving rise to G.O.Case No.03 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) In future, if his active participation is found in similar type of cases, his bail bond shall automatically be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T