Lal Bahadur Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13929 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2020 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

LAL BAHADUR RAI Son of Late Skaldeo Rai Resident of Village - Sisai, Police Station - Mashrakh, District - Saran at Chapra. 2.

VINOD RAI @ VINOD KUMAR YADAV Son of Lal Bahadur Rai Resident of Village - Sisai, Police Station - Mashrakh, District - Saran at Chapra. 3.

PRAMOD RAI @ PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV Son of Lal Bahadur Rai Resident of Village - Sisai, Police Station - Mashrakh, District - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh Mr. Amit Kumar Anand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, the learned counsel for the informant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 332 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506, 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that it is a case of free fight between two groups. Both the parties have sustained injuries. Four members of defense side have suffered grievous injuries. One person from the prosecution side has also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13929 of 2022(2) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 suffered grievous injury.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted further that in three cases, which have been mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition, the investigating authorities submitted final form, whereas in Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 52 of 1999, petitioner no. 1 has been acquitted.

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 332 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/Mahesh U T