← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13714/2025bail granted

Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-28Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-478 Year-2024 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Upendra Yadav Son of Kailash Yadav Resident of Village- Bakhari Baluwa Tola PS -Kuchaikote, Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Adesh Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kuchaikote PS Case No. 478 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 136.53 litres of liquor was recovered from gunny bags. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that recovery is made from an open place, which is accessible to one and all. It is further submitted that the name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13714 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 has transpired on secret information. The petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. Other co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 30.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3815 of 2025. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kuchaikote PS Case No. 478 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T