← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27510/2017dismissed

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-07Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27510 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2017 Thana -JOGBANI District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar, Son of Aalakhchand Yadav, Resident of Village- Bishanpur, P.S.- Jogbani, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Jogbani P.S.Case No. 17 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30 and 38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (for short 'the Act'), the petitioner has filed the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of pre-arrest bail. 3.

In view of the provision prescribed under sub-section

(2) of Section 76 of 'the Act', as also in view of the order dated 07.07.2017 passed by this Court in the matter of Ashok Sahani Vs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27510 of 2017 (2) dt.07-07-2017 2 / 2 State of Bihar (Cr.Misc. No. 26109 of 2017), I am of the considered opinion that an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would not be maintainable in any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of offence committed under 'the Act'.

4.

Hence, the present application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a case involving accusation of offence committed under the 'the Act' is disposed of as not maintainable. 5.

In case the petitioner surrenders and seeks bail, the court below shall keep in mind the observations made by this Court in the aforementioned order dated 07.07.2017 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 26109 of 2017 while disposing of the bail application on merits.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T