Kapleshwar Bhagat @ Tetar Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27219 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -475 Year- 2013 Thana -BAHERA District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Kapleshwar Bhagat @ Tetar Bhagat, son of Late Khusilal Bhagat, resident of Villge- Shivram, Police Station- Bahera, District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Shamimul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 475 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. This is the second time the petitioner has filed this application for grant of regular bail. Earlier his application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 23.02.2017 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1468 of 2017, with the observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that now the charge has been framed in this case and petitioner has been in judicial custody since 07.08.2016. Having heard both sides, in view submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27219 of 2017 (2) dt.21-06-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Benipur, Darbhanga, in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 475 of 2013, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T