Siman Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25087 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-439 Year-2020 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

SIMAN CHAUDHARY S/O RAMDHANI CHAUDHARY R/o village- Mai Farida, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda 2.

TARO DEVI W/O SIMAN CHAUDHARY R/o village- Mai Farida, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand i.e., one motorcycle, golden chain and Rs.50,000/-.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25087 of 2021(2) dt.19-01-2022 2/2 further submits that petitioner no.1 is father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law of the deceased, namely, Anjali Kumari, who is daughter of the informant. He further submits that they are separate from the husband of the deceased and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased and her husband. He further submits that the husband of the deceased is in custody.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 439 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T