Umesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3672 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2014 Thana -KOILWAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Umesh Singh son of Late Tapeshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Gidha, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur at Ara .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Koilwar Police Station Case No. 181 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 420, 406, 120B, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation against the petitioner is that he executed sale deed in favour of the informant in respect of some lands which had already been gifted by father of the petitioner to the wife of the petitioenr.
The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner is ready to get execute fresh sale deed by his wife in favour of the informant or return the entire consideration amount
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3672 of 2015 (2) dt.28-01-2015 2/2 to the informant.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in Koilwar Police Station Case no. 181 of 2014, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
It is made clear that after furnishing bail bonds before the concerned court, the petitioner shall get execute fresh sale deed through his wife in favour of the informant and shall bear the execution cost as well as stamp of the sale deed or return the consideration amount with 9% interest to the informant within four months from the date of his release, failing which the concerned court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Namita/- U