Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4520 of 2019 ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar, son of Balkrishna Prasad Yadav, resident of Village and P.O.- Nandlali, P.S.-Bihara, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Labour Employment and Training Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa 3.

District Magistrate, Saharsa 4.

Deputy Collector, Establishment, Saharsa ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent authorities in not regularizing him on Class-IV post in Saharsa Collectorate despite his having worked on the aforesaid post on temporary basis for several years.

3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has worked as a daily-wage employee in the Collectorate of Saharsa and the attached offices thereto. As a result of his having worked in the Collectorate, his name

Patna High Court CWJC No.4520 of 2019 dt.26-03-2019 2/3 figured in the panel which was prepared in the year 1997. Later, his name found mention in other panels till about 2018.

4. The learned learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to Advertisement no. 03 of 2006, inviting application for being considered for empanelment for appointment on the Class-IV posts, the petitioner had applied and was placed at serial No. 150 in the panel prepared in the year 2014, which was finalized in the year 2017. However, despite the petitioner having all requisite qualifications and he belonging to reserved category, he was not appointed. The petitioner has also not been communicated any reason for his not being appointed even though his name fell in successive panels and ultimately in the panel which was prepared in the year 2018.

5. Under the aforesaid circumstances, this Court only directs the petitioner to make a representation before the District Magistrate, Saharsa (respondent No. 3), detailing his grievances within a period of four weeks from today. On receipt of such representation, the District Magistrate,

Patna High Court CWJC No.4520 of 2019 dt.26-03-2019 3/3 Saharsa (respondent No. 3) will pass a reasoned order within a period of four weeks thereafter.

6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02/04/2019