Rajan Yadav @ Rajan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15834 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-517 Year-2024 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR DistrictSiwan ====================================================== Rajan Yadav @ Rajan Son of Shakchandra Yadav Resident of VillageShahganj, P.S.- G.B. Nagar, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, petitioner on 15.10.2024 assaulted grandson of the informant, namely, Dhananjay Kumar by lathi and rod causing injury on head who was admitted in the PMCH.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that on account of dispute

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15834 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/2 relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that from the side of the petitioner also a criminal case came to be instituted. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow was not repeated.

5. Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting Dhananjay by lathi and rod causing injury on head which is vital part of the body. It is further submitted that Dhananjay was admitted in the PMCH and has suffered a grievous injury

6. In view of the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with G.B.Nagar P.S. Case No. 517 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned ACJM-IV, Siwan/Successor Court.

7. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T