Rajendra Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12884 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2024 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Rajendra Sah Son of Ram Avatar Sah R/O Vill- Gaura, P.S.- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi 2.

Jogindra Sah Son of Ram Avatar Sah R/O Vill- Gaura, P.S.- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and Petitioner No. 1 is aged about 70 years and Petitioner No. 2 is aged about 66 years and the informant alleges that petitioners entered his house and Rajendra (Petitioner No. 1) assaulted the informant by an iron rod causing injury on head, while Jogindra (petitioner No. 2) assaulted the son of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on hand. 4.

It is next submitted that from perusal of the injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12884 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 report, it would manifest that informant suffered no injury and the injury suffered by the son of the informant is simple in nature and the blow is not alleged to be repeated. It is also submitted that Petitioner No. 1 herein instituted Nanpur PS Case No. 439 of 2024 against the informant and his side. It is further submitted that persons, who have remained persons with clean antecedent all throughout, have been made a criminal based on false allegation, on account of disputes relating to land.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also taking into account the age of the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 433 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T