Dablu Kumar Soni @ Pintu Sonar @ Dablu Kumosar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31669 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJAUN District- BANKA ====================================================== Dablu Kumar Soni @ Pintu Sonar @ Dablu Kumosar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 60 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 24.03.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner's name transpired on this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31669 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/3 nothing against the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent and has remained in judicial custody for more than three and half months, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 60 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31669 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 3/3 It is also made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of such offence, in future, his bail bonds will be cancelled.

.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T