Mahashottam Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVIEW No.52 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20846 of 2018 ====================================================== Mahashottam Jha, S/o Late Laxmi Kant Jha, Resident of Road No. - 18, Rajeev Nagar, Patna - 800024, P.S. - Rajeev Nagar, P.O. - Keshari Nagar, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Director, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.
L.N. Mishra Institute of Economic Development and Social Change through its Director - 1, Bailey Road, Patna.
6.
The Director, L.N. Mishra Institute of Economic Development and Social Change, 1 Bailey Road, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
Ms. Aditi Hansaria, Adv.
Mr. Yash Sahay, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Advocate General For the L.N.M. Institute :
Mr. Vipin Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court C. REV. No.52 of 2025(3) dt.30-04-2025 2/3 (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 30-04-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks modification in paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 27.08.2024 passed in a batch of writ petitions, the lead case being C.W.J.C. No. 644 of 2023.
3. Paragraph 41 of the judgment reads as follows :
"CWJC No. 20846 of 2018 projects the case of only one petitioner, who was in service while the takeover was effected and who was regularised as per Annexure-P/35 in CWJC No. 10463 of 2018. He has retired in December, 2021 and would be entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme."
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the date of retirement of the petitioner/Mahashottam Jha is 31.12.2011 and not 31.12.2021.
5. Let the date of retirement of the petitioner/Mahashottam Jha in paragraph 41 of the
Patna High Court C. REV. No.52 of 2025(3) dt.30-04-2025 3/3 judgment, referred to above, be read as 31.12.2011.
6. The judgment, referred to above, stands modified to the extent indicated above.
7. The review petition stands disposed off.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Praveen-II/- U