Md. Israil @ Md. Israil Mansoori @ Israil Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31236 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -95 Year- 2016 Thana -MEERGANJ District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Israil @ Md. Israil Mansoori @ Israil Mansoori Son of Late Umu Mansoori Resident of Village - Parasmani, Police Station - Sarsi in the district of Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of bail in connection with S.T.No.192 of 2017 (arising out of Mirganj P.S.Case No.95 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 25.4.2017 passed in Cr.

Misc.No.10759 of 2017, with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the charge has been framed, which will appears from Annexure-3 of this petition.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31236 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and from perusal of the record, it appears that the charge has been framed in this case. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter as well as the fact that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon him, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri V.S.Pandey, Addl. Sessions Judge-V, Purnea in connection with S.T.No.192 of 2017 (arising out of Mirganj P.S.Case No.95 of 2016).

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U