Umesh Prasad v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4038 of 2022 ====================================================== Umesh Prasad S/o Late Ramashish Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - ESIC Colony, Amebedkar Path, Saket Vihar, Rukanpura, P.S. - Rajeev Nagar, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Chief Commissioner, Head Quarter, Employee State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, C.I.G. Marg, New Delhi.
2.
The Additional Commissioner, (Vigilance) Head Quarter, Employee State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, C.I.G. Marg, New Delhi. 3.
The Chief Director General (Vigilance), Head Quarter, Employee State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, C.I.G. Marg, New Delhi. 4.
The Director General, Employee State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, C.I.G. Marg, New Delhi.
5.
The Regional Director, Employee State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna.
6.
The Deputy Director, (Administration) Employee State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna. 7.
Suresh Prasad, Son of Late Ramashis Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - ESIC Colony, Saket Vihar, Ambedkarpath, P.S. - Rajeev Nagar, P.O. B.V. College, District - Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Praveen Kumar Sinha, Sr. Panel Counsel For the E.S.I.C.
:
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Bijpuria, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(i) For issue a direction upon the concerned respondent to take necessary action against the respondent no.7, Suresh Prasad in view of show cause notice vide letter
Patna High Court CWJC No.4038 of 2022(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 42A/Case No. 464/2000Eiii dated 11.04.2019 issued under the signature of respondent no.6, the Deputy Director (Administration), Employee State Insurance Corporation, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondents authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U