Deepak Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12634 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2018 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
DEEPAK KUMAR Son of Late Mahendra Singh Resident of Village - Akhtiyarpur Patedha, P.S.- Sarai, Distt - Vaishali. 2.
Satish Kumar @ Satish Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh Son of Sachindra Singh Resident of Village - Akhtiyarpur, Patedha, P.S.- Sarai, Distt - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anirudh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. R.P. Nat,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 385, 504, 506/34 IPC registered in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 199 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. Both the parties are working in Toll Plaza. Injuries are all simple in nature. The accusation of demanding rangdari is general and omnibus in nature.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. Rajnish Ranjan, learned ACJM XIII-cum-Sub Judge XIV, Hajipur (Vaishali), in connection with Sarai P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12634 of 2019(2) dt.01-03-2019 2/2 No. 199 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.
ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T