Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14593 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Arun Kumar Son of Sambhu Yadav @ Prabhu Prasad @ Umesh Kumar @ Prabhu Rai Resident of Village - Dharhari, P.S.- Chiraiya, District - East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sumit Kumar Gupta, Advocate Ms. Isha Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309 (4) of B.N.S, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, miscreants snatched a bag containing Rs. 135550/- along with mobile and charger from the informant on the point of pistol.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the First Information Report has been lodged against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of coaccused. It is further submitted that looted articles were recovered from co-accused Ripu Kumar who has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56593

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14593 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 of 2025 (Annexure-P/2). Further, submissions is that no independent witness has been examined and the petitioner was not arrested on the spot. Petitioner is in custody since 12.11.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no recovery has been made from the petitioner, coupled with the fact that co-accused with graver allegations has already been granted bail by this Court, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No 63 of 2025, subject to the conditions that : (i) One of the bailors will be his close relative/family members.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned. (Soni Shrivastava, J) vashudha/- U T