Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Raju @ Pradip Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15316 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Raju @ Pradip Kumar Yadav Son of Shiv Bachan Yadav R/O - Chamarpur, P.S.- Shahpur, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Babita Kumari Daughter of Ramashray Singh Yadav R/O - Ramnagar, Ara, P.S.- Ara Nawada, District - Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rizwanul Jama Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhojpur Mahila P.S. Case No. 30 of 2024, dated 22.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 506, 354, 498-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Learned A.P.P., at the outset, submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carry punishment of less than seven years.

4. The said submission of the learned A.P.P. for the State is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15316 of 2025(8) dt.18-08-2025 2/2

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the investigation of the case against the petitioner is still continuing but then the petitioner has not been issued notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. on which learned A.P.P. submits that the anticipatory bail application be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).

6. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024.

7. The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the direction contained in the said order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T