Singhasan Ram @ Sigasan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29755 of 2017 (2) dt.10-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29755 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2016 Thana -NASRIGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== SINGHASAN RAM @ SIGASAN RAM, son of Late Sadhu Ram, resident of Village- Judwan, P.S.- Akorhigola, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, she buffalo of the informant was stolen away and during investigation the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Dhanji Ram and the petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2017.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29755 of 2017 (2) dt.10-07-2017 Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T