Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26694/2017bail granted

Mahendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-30Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26694 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Mahendra Singh Son of Late Raj Nath Singh, Resident of VillageBasdiha, Police Station- Gorari, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Excise Case No.203 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a)j of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 22.500 ltrs. of English wine.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has remained in custody for about two months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent of the petitioner as well as the other facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26694 of 2017 (2) dt.30-06-2017 2/2 case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Excise Case No.203 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U