Bishnu Dayal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.646 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10442 of 2017 ====================================================== Bishnu Dayal Sah Son of Sakaldeep Sah Resident of Village and P.O.- Ankuri, Police Station- Paliganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Ajit Kumar, The Special Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Bharti Mehta, The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board through its Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

4.

Dr. Bharti Mehta, The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 5.

Mr. Anil Kumar, The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 6.

Mr. Jyoti Kumar, The District Education Officer, Patna. 7.

Managing Committee, Sri Kamla Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhya Vidyalaya, Ankuri, Patna through its Secretary Akhileshwar Ojha. 8.

Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, Special Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha (Gp 27), Advocate For the BSSB :

Mr. S.S. Sundram, Advocate :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the BSSB (Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board).

Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly at the outset submits that the order passed by the Writ Court stands complied and thus seeks permission to withdraw the contempt

Patna High Court MJC No.646 of 2020(4) dt.25-04-2023 2/2 application.

At this stage, the learned counsel submits that though the order of the Writ Court has been complied as the Authority competent has passed an order but then that order is not in accordance with law.

Be that as it may, the petitioner can avail his remedies available in law against the order passed by the competent authority in pursuance of the order passed by the Writ Court. (Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U