Patna High CourtCWJC/19150/2016disposed

Rajan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19150 of 2016 =========================================================== Rajan Chaudhary, S/o Sri Vinod Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Repura Rampur Vishwanath, P.O.- Jaitpur, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar.

2. Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar.

3. The Director Administration of Accounts and Self Employment, District Rural Development Agency, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

5. District Panchayat Raj Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6. Deputy Development Commissioner, Muzaffarpur.

7. Block Development Officer, Saraiya, Muzaffarpur.

8. Ram Pravesh Rai, father's name not known, then Mukhiya, Rampur Vishwanat Panchayat, P.S.- Saraiya, Distt- Muzaffarpur.

9. Panchayat Secretary, Rampur Vishwanath Panchayat, Saraiya, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, GA-5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 08-05-2017 With regard to the grievance in question canvassed in the Public Interest Litigation, on petitioner's own showing, a complaint dated 3.8.2015 has been filed before the Lokayukta organization with regard to the acts of commission and omission alleged against Respondent Nos.8 and 9.

On a perusal of the observations made by the Lokayukta organization, it is seen that the mater is pending before the Lokayukta

Patna High Court CWJC No.19150 of 2016 dt.08-05-2017 2/2 organization.

That being so, for the present, indulgence into the matter is not called for. The petitioner may prosecute the matter, which is pending before the Lokayukta organization and we are confident that the Lokayukta organization shall conclude the enquiry and proceed in accordance to law.

With the aforesaid observations and liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 16.05.2017 Transmission Date