← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7925/2021disposed

Ramji Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-11Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7925 of 2021 ====================================================== Ramji Prasad Son of Sri Ambika Prasad, Resident of Village - Daroga Kuan, P.S.- Hilsa, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna. 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

5.

The Superintendent of Police, Rail, Patna.

6.

Deepak Kumar, the then SHO Rail Police Station, Bakhtiyarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Babita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 11-02-2022 The matter is heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. State counsel accept notice for respondents. Petitioner's counsel to furnish copy of the petition to the State counsel.

3. In the present petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:

"1. That this is an application for issuance of a Writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent Senior Superintendent of Police Patna to issue Last Payment Certificate (hereinafter referred to as the LPC) of the petitioner, due to that

Patna High Court CWJC No.7925 of 2021 dt.11-02-2022 2/2 payment of salary has not been made and further for directing the respondent to release the salary of the petitioner and further for issuance of any other appropriate writ or writs, order or orders it may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court."

4. In support of the aforesaid relief petitioner submitted representations dated 22.09.2019, 23.09.2019, vide Annexures- 3, 4 and 5. However, concerned respondent has not passed any order either in accepting or rejecting the petitioner's representations.

5. Therefore, the concerned respondent is hereby directed to decide the petitioner's claim stated in the representations. If petitioner is entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and disbursed to him. Above exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order, failing which petitioner is entitled to litigation cost and it is quantified @ Rs. 10,000/-

6. With the above observations, the instant petition stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) rakhi/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 24.02.2022 Transmission Date