← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26740/2017disposed

Khublal Manjhi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-30Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26740 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2016 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Khublal Manjhi Son of Ram Autar Manjhi.

2. Munna Manjhi Son of Khublal Manjhi. Both are resident of VillageKhairamal, Police Station- Pipra, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Pipra P.S.Case No.55 of 2016, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and the allegation is under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It further appears from perusal of the record that the trial has been commenced and the witnesses have been examined.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that all the witnesses have been examined except the Doctor and I.O of the case. The petitioner is in custody for about one year.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26740 of 2017 (3) dt.30-06-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that the case is pending only for evidence of the Doctor and I.O. of the case, as such the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude it within a period of three months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court concerned itself, who will consider the materials available during the trial of the petitioner and will pass appropriate order.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U