Kamaldeo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6296 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Kamaldeo Singh 2.

Ram Ekbal Singh, 3.

Anugrah Narayan Singh.

All are Sons of Motilal Chaudhary @ Motilala Chaudhary, all Resident of Mohalla- Wazirganj (Karwandiya), P.O. Karwandiya, Police StationSasaram(M), District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 4.

Sasaram Municipality through its Executive Officer, Sasaram Municipality, District-Rohtas.

5.

Executive Officer, Sasaram Municipality, Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.4 & 5:

Mr.Bajrangi Lal, Advocate For the State : Mr.Yogendra Prasad, A.A.G.-7 For the private respondents: Mr.Amit Srivastava, Sr.Advocate : Mr. Baban Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2024 Heard Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Bajrangi Lal, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 & 5, Mr.Yogendra Prasad, learned A.A.G.-7 for the State and Mr.Amit Srivastava, learned senior counsel for the private respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ application may be disposed of in terms of the order dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.6296 of 2020(3) dt.15-07-2024 2/2 01.02.2022 passed in CWJC No.4536 of 2021 by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners have already filed the relevant documents before the respondent No.5, and the respondent No.5 is directed to dispose of the application filed by the petitioners within a period of three months.

3. Mr.Amit Srivastava, learned senior counsel for the intervenor-respondents contends that he has also filed their documents before the respondent No.5 and they are still pending for consideration.

4. In view of the aforesaid, the respondent No.5 is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioners as well as intevenor-respondents within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U