Parsuram Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13897 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2018 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Parsuram Singh, Son of Chandeshwar Prasad, R/o Mohalla- Gandhipuram, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Bihar State Mines Corporation Ltd., Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chhote Lal Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No.298 of 2018 for allegedly having committed the offence under Sections 379, 403, 406, 409, 119, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire allegation against the present petitioner is false and fabricated and is motivated by the informant who is adamant to tarnish his career. It is further submitted that the storage of mining materials in the godown is done in presence of senior officials and other team members, but for the reasons best known to the informant, the entire blame has been saddled on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13897 of 2019(3) dt.23-05-2019 2/3 the shoulder of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner had been posted outside intermittently during his tenure and finally he was relieved from the depot on 10.02.2018. He thus submits that thorough inquiry should be conducted to fix the liability and not to saddle the entire blame on the petitioner's shoulder. It is submitted that now since the said depot has been closed down and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence, the petitioner may be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail and the petitioner is willing to co-operate in whatever investigation is done and also appear in the court as and when required. He submits that the petitioner is a responsible public servant and will not abscond or tamper with the evidence and is still functioning in his present place of posting.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and the nature of allegations made against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13897 of 2019(3) dt.23-05-2019 3/3 Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No.298 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T