Anjali Kumari @ Anjali Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30776 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2017 Thana -BIDUPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Anjali Kumari @ Anjali Raj, D/o Sri Samser Bahadur Singh, R/o VillageKhanpur Pakri, P.S. Bidupur, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to the written report of the informant, his grand daughter, namely, Deep Shikha Kumari along with the petitioner i.e. Anjali Kumari @ Anjali Raj had went somewhere and upon search, they could not be found. It was further stated in the complaint made to the police that there is apprehension that anything can happen with the minor girls (including the petitioner).

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the girls have returned back to their home and the said Deep Sikha

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30776 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 Kumari in her statement made before the learned trial court under section 164 Cr. P. C. on 9.5.2017 (Annexure-2), has stated that she has been tortured by her parents, compelling her to run away with her friend i.e. the petitioner, however, no adverse incident has taken place and they had returned back on their own. The said Deep Shikha Kumari has further stated in her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. that the petitioner is not responsible for any incident. It has been further submitted by the petitioner that admittedly, the petitioner has no role in the alleged incident. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case more particularly the fact that the victim has herself stated in her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. that she has not been allured by the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

According, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. XIV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2017.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U