Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9913/2018bail granted

Rakesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9913 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2017 Thana -KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Rakesh Ram Son of Mahendra Ram Resident of Village- Bairiya Chamar Toli P.S. Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Kumari Vandana, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Manoj Kumar - 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 08.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33904 of 2017 with observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that in this case charge has already been framed and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the order dated 08.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33904 of 2017, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9913 of 2018 (2) dt.28-02-2018 2/2 Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 192 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T