Alaha Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15085 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.
Alaha Yadav son of Gena Yadav 2.
Mauzi Yadav son of Alha Yadav 3.
Ram Prakash Mahto son of Ram Saran Mahto 4.
Uchit Baitha son of Badlu Baitha 5.
Gautam Mahto son of late Dinesh Mahto 6.
Mohan Mahto Son of Ram Lagan Mahto All are resident of VillageGangauli, P.O.-Sakhmohan, P.S.-Bibhutipur, District-Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Collector, Samastipur.
3.
The Circle Officer Bibhutipur Block, District-Samastipur 4.
Surendra Rajak son of Bishnu Deo Rajak Resident of Pramod Kumar, son of Late Ambika Prasad resident of Village- Gangauli, P.O.-Sakhmohan, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District-Samastipur 5.
Pradeep Narayan Singh son of Late Baleshwar Narayan Singh Resident of Village-Dehaur, P.S.-Barh, District-Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha- SC19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 29-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
"i. For quashing / setting aside the order dated 05.05.2015 passed by Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mridula Mishra, the Chairman, Bihar Land
Patna High Court CWJC No.15085 of 2016(2) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Cas No. 832 / 2013 [Arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 15227/2011] [Surendra Rajak VS. The State of Bihar & Ors.] whereby and where under the order dated 24.05.2011 passed by the Collector, Samastipur in Basgit Purcha Appeal No. 27/2010 as well as the order dated 23.03.2004 passed by the Circle Officer, Bibhutipur, Samastipur in Case No. 23 of 2003-04/25.09.2006 are set aside and further, the matter has been remanded back to the Circle Officer, Bibhutipur to decide both the issues properly as per statutory provision and the matter must be decided within three months from the date of production/receipt of this order without following the facts and circumstances of the case. ii. For grant of any other relief or reliefs, if the petitioners are found entitled to."
3. For want of prosecution, dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U