Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24817 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2020 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
SANTOSH KUMAR SON OF LATE BRAJ NANDAN PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- BLOCK ROAD MADARSA GALI RAXAUL, POLICE STATION- RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT J-8, PHASE-2, GULSHAN VATIKA, NEAR HOUSING BOARD, SEJBAHAR, POLICE STATIONMUJGAHAN, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH-492015 2.
ALOK PRASAD @ ALOK KUMAR SON OF LATE BRAJ NANDAN PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- BLOCK ROAD MADARSA GALI, RAXAUL, POLICE STATION- RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF FUTKANI CHOWK, BISHANPUR ROAD, JHUMARI TILAIYA, POLICE STATIONJHUMARI TILAIYA, DISTRICT-KODERMA (JHARKHAND) 3.
SAVITRI DEVI WIFE OF LATE BRAJ NANDAN PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BLOCK ROAD RAXAUL, POLICE STATION- RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF FUTKANI CHOWK, BISHANPUR ROAD, JHUMARI TILAIYA, POLICE STATION- JHUMARI TILAIYA, DISTRICT- KODERMA (JHARKHAND) 4.
VIJAY KUMAR @ VIJAY KUMAR PRASAD SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- DEO NAGAR, POLICE STATION- BANU CHHAPAR BETTIAH, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
ANIL KUMAR VERMA SON OF LATE RAM BILAS PRASAD RESIDENT OF DHARM SAMAJ CHOWK, POLICE STATIONCHHAUTANI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this quashing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24817 of 2021(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2 application, granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points which have been raised in the present application, before the learned court below, at the appropriate stage.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. This quashing application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as indicated above.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T