Brijnandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4750 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Brijnandan Prasad Son of Prayag Sao Resident of Vilalge-Mora Talab, P.S.- Rahui, District-Nalanda.

2.

Dhiraj Kumar Son of Brinjandan Prasad Resident of Vilalge-Mora Talab, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda.

3.

Pradhuman Kumar Son of Brijnandan Prasad Resident of Vilalge-Mora Talab, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda.

4.

Pramendra Kumar Son of Brijnandan Prasad Resident of Vilalge-Mora Talab, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda.

5.

Pankaj Kumar Son of Brijnandan Prasad Resident of Vilalge-Mora Talab, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda.

6.

Vivek Kumar Son of Brij Nandan Prasad Resident of Vilalge-Mora Talab, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Arbitrator-Cum-Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Nalanda. 4.

The Competent Authority-Cum-District-Land Acquisition Officer, Nalanda. 5.

The Union of India through the Chief Manager Director, National Highway Authority of India, New Delhi.

6.

The Project Director, National Highway No.31, (Rajauli- Bakhtiyarpur) Four Lane, G1 and G2 Ground Floor, Shiumitra Apartment, Vivekanand Marg, Boring Road, Patna, 800013, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hansraj For the Respondent/s :

AC to GP-14 For the NHAI :

Mr. Maurya Vijay Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-14 for the State and learned counsel for the National Highway Authority of India.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

Patna High Court CWJC No.4750 of 2025(2) dt.10-07-2025 2/2 arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to assail the Award before the Arbitrator in terms of Section 3G(5) and others of the National Highway Act, 1956.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Satyavrat Verma, J) shikha/- U