← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17287/2016disposed

Ram Babu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-12Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17287 of 2016 ====================================================== Ram Babu Paswan son of Ramanand Paswan Resident of Village- Pipla Khagari, Police Station-Masaurhi, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Jahanabad.

2. The Programme Officer, Establishment, Jehanabad.

3. The Block Development Officer-Cum-Member Secretary, Block Teachers Employment Committee, Kako, District-Jehanabad.

4. The Headmaster of the Upgraded High School, Golakpur Circle, Kakpo, District-Jehanabad.

5. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Saidabab, Persaine, Kako, Jehanabad.

6. Mukhiya of Gram Panchyat, Saidabad, Persaine, Kako, Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was validly appointed on the post of Panchayat Teacher in the year 2006. He is regularly working and he was paid salary up to November, 2015 and without assigning any reason, suddenly the salary of the petitioner was stopped by the respondents. He submits that the appointment of the petitioner is legal and valid and the petitioner is regularly discharging his duties as Panchayat Teacher and as such, there is no justification in denying the

Patna High Court CWJC No.17287 of 2016(2) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 salary to the petitioner. Since the writ petition is pending since 17.10.2016, no counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No. 2, District Programme Officer, Establishment, Jehanabad, to verify the record and if it is found the appointment of the petitioner is legal and valid and the petitioner has discharged his duties as Panchayat Teacher, Respondent No. 2, District Programme Officer, Establishment, Jehanabad, shall ensure the payment of salary of the petitioner with arrears within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) ajay gupta/- U