Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Dabbu Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2515 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1605 Year- 2011 Thana -PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPURNIA ======================================================

1. Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Dabbu Singh son of Late Umanand Singh Resident of village - Ekawa, P.S. Jalalgarh, District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Bibi Aara Begam wife of Tayab Ansari Resident of Piparpati, Nahar Tola, P.S. Jalalgarh, District - Purnea .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 22-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the undue delay in filing of the complaint and the fact that the complainant was not in a position to produce the medical papers on which the earlier complaint was dismissed, in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with C.A. No. 1605 of 2011, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2515 of 2015 (2) dt.22-01-2015 2/2 satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under sections 438(2) Cr. P. C. That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T