Harihar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4007 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Harihar Prasad Son of Late Dwarika Prasad, resident of Village - Misrauliya, P.S. Majhagarh, District - Gopalganj.
2.
Harishankar Prasad, Son of Late Dwarika Prasad, resident of Village - Misrauliya, P.S. Majhagarh, District - Gopalganj. 3.
Raju Prasad, Son of Late Dwarika Prasad, resident of Village - Misrauliya, P.S. Majhagarh, District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Collectorate Building, District - Gopalganj.
3.
The Additional District Magistrate-cum-Additional Collector, Collectorate Building, District - Gopalganj.
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer, District - Gopalganj. 5.
The Block Development Officer, Block- Majha, District - Gopalganj. 6.
The Circle Officer, Majhagarh Circle, District - Gopalganj. 7.
Shivji Mahto Son of Late Bhola Mahto, resident of Village - Misrauliya, P.S. - Majhagarh, District - Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (GP18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2022 The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent no. 3 i.e. the Additional District Magistrate-cumAdditional Collector, Gopalganj to expeditiously dispose off the pending appeal bearing Miscellaneous Appeal no. 3 of 2018-19, preferred by the private respondent no. 7.
The learned counsel for the respondent- State submits that in case, any appeal is pending, it is incumbent upon the
Patna High Court CWJC No.4007 of 2022(2) dt.13-10-2022 2/2 respondent- authorities to consider the same in accordance with law and dispose of the same, hence, the respondent no. 3 shall definitely dispose of the aforesaid pending appeal, within a stipulated time frame.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to dispose off the present writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to dispose off the pending appeal, within a period of 12 weeks of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, by passing a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, after hearing the appellant and the affected parties.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U