Sikta Singh @ Sitta Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24647 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana -BAUNSI District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Sikta Singh @ Sitta Singh son of Pushkar Singh Resident of Village - Tamghatti, Police Station - Bausi, District - Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with B.P.No.352 of 2017 in connection with Bounsi P.S.Case no.133 of 2015, (G.R.No.3563 of 2015), registered for offences punishable under Sections 394/302 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and later on his name transpired on the basis of confessional statement of the coaccused. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement, there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner, not put on T.I.P. and he has clean antecedent. The petitioner has remained in custody for about 4 1⁄2 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24647 of 2017 (3) dt.10-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria in connection with Bousi P.S.Case No.133 of 2015.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T