Rajdip Kumar Verma @ Rajdip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14343 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Rajdip Kumar Verma @ Rajdip Kumar Son of Ramraj Mehata @ Ram Raj Mehta @ Ram Raj Mahto Resident of Village- Kazakpur, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Anita Kumari Wife of Rajdip Kumar Verma @ Rajdip Kumar, D/O- Suresh Mehta Resident of Vill- Bariya, P.S.- Mali, District- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey For the State :

Ms. Gulnar Begum For the Complainant :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 51 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Section 341, 323, 379, 498(A) of the IPC and 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 13.05.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14343 of 2025(7) dt.08-12-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. He has submitted further that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to complainant (opposite party no. 2).

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 51 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

7. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the complainant). The interim maintenance granted by this Court shall be subject to adjustment, if any other court grants maintenance to the opposite party no. 2.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T