← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18466/2025bail granted

Baijnath Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-15Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18466 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2024 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Baijnath Singh Yadav Son of Late Banvari Yadav R/o - Kathwara, P.S.- Gurua, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Arnesh Kr. Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 329 of 2024 dated 15.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 317(3) of the BNS and sections 25(1-AA)/26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, one loaded Enfield rifle and 20 cartridges were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18466 of 2025(2) dt.15-04-2025 2/2 this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 329 of 2024, with the condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T