Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29780/2017rejected

Gopal Mandal @ Gopal Roy v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29780 of 2017 (3) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29780 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -140 Year- 2016 Thana -DHAMDAHA District- PURNIA ====================================================== Gopal Mandal @ Gopal Roy, son of Chamo Patel @ Chano Mandal, R/o Village Satish Nagar, P.S. Pasraha, District- Khagria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with S.T. No. 30 of 2017 arising out of Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 140 of 2016, registered under Sections 363 and 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 16.03.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1778 of 2017 by this Court. No any fresh ground has been raised in the present petition to reconsider the prayer for bail. A report regarding the present stage of trial has been received through letter no. 360 dated 25.07.2017, from the court of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea, which shows that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29780 of 2017 (3) dt.20-09-2017 the trial of the petitioner will be concluded within six months. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months by taking all effective steps. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within aforesaid period of six months, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T