Raushan Kumar @ Bhaglu @ Raushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24948 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2020 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== RAUSHAN KUMAR @ BHAGLU @ RAUSHAN SINGH S/oRAMASHISH SINGH @ CHHOTE SINGH R/o Village- Ramdiri (Bhawanandpur Tola), P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 16-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 379, 147, 149, 323, 307, 504, 353 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, section 27 of the Arms Act, section 15 of The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and sections 11 and 56 of The Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2019 As per the prosecution case, on receiving information of illegal mining of sand and earth, it is stated that the informant proceeded with the home guards towards the spot. The accused persons who were armed with bricks, stones, firearm etc surrounded the informant and his team, broke the glass of their vehicles and also fired. The informant further states that information was given and the police force reached the spot. The accused were calling each other with the names of Pappu Singh, R.N. Singh and Subodh Singh. Part of the occurrence was also recorded in the mobile phone.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24948 of 2021(2) dt.16-11-2021 2/2 that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name transpired in course of investigation. Inspite of being in custody since 27.12.2020 and charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade. He has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case together with the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 10 months, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Matihani P.S. Case no. 168 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M 1st Class, Begusarai/concerned Court. (Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U