Iltaf Ali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24260 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2019 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Purnia ====================================================== ILTAF ALI S/o- LATE FOULAD ALI THE WARD KRIYANWYAN AWAM PRABANDHAN SAMITTEE, WARD NO. 11, GRAM PANCHAYAT RANGPURA UTTAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPURA, P.S. MIRGANJ, DISTRICT- PURNEA.
... ... Petitioner.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2021 As prayed for, through Video Conferencing, let the learned counsel for the petitioner remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office vide its notes dated 26.03.2021, within four weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State, through Video Conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No.95 of 2019 registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sri Vivek Chandra Verma, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Purnea.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24260 of 2021(2) dt.07-07-2021 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, earlier, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court on merit vide order dated 08.02.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. No.81790 of 2019. Further submission is that the petitioner is ready to pay the defalcated amount, as detailed in the F.I.R.
Since the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail has already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. No.81790 of 2019, as such, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T