Sajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13105 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-910 Year-2024 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Sajan Kumar S/O Dharmendra Prasad @ Karu Singh R/O VillageChakpitamberpur (Bhikhua), P.S- Fatuha, Distt.- Patna. 2.

Jairam Kumar S/O Chandar Prasad R/O Village- Chakpitamberpur (Bhikhua), P.S- Fatuha, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y. C. Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 329(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, on 18.12.2024 at about 11 AM, when informant was ploughing his field, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came there and assaulted informant by means of lathi, danda, rod and fired 6-7 rounds of pistol as a result of which, informant sustained multiple injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13105 of 2026(5) dt.14-07-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case on account of land dispute. F.I.R. has been lodged against 15 named accused persons, including these petitioners but allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation specific of any overt act against these petitioners. Informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence. Though there is allegation of indiscriminate firing, but I.O. has not found any firearms injury and prosecution has not annexed any injury report issued by a Government hospital which itself creates doubt over veracity of the prosecution story. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering nature of accusation, materials available on record and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13105 of 2026(5) dt.14-07-2026 3/3 Fatuha P. S. Case No. 910 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T