← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12354/2020bail rejected

Rinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-11Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12354 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2019 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Rinki Devi (female), aged about 30 years, Wife of Shrawan Manjhi @ Sarwan Manjhi Resident of Village - Shahwazpur, P.S.- Tekari, DistrictGaya 2.

Shrawan Manjhi @ Sarwan Manjhi, (Male), aged 35 years, Son of Bhagat Manjhi Resident of Village - Shahwazpur, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-09-2020 Heard Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No. 139 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the son of the Informant, namely, Kundan @ Taini and one Shanti Devi have been hanged to death.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the First Information Report and and the materials available on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12354 of 2020(3) dt.11-09-2020 2/2 record shows that the allegation has been attributed against the husband, father-in-law and Dewar of the deceased Shanti Devi and the petitioners are nowhere in the alleged offence and they have falsely been made accused in the present case. This Court has perused the Case Diary.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

If the petitioners surrender, the court below, without being prejudiced by this order, will take decision in accordance with law.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T