Jitendra Rajwanshi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29848 of 2017 (2) dt.11-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29848 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2017 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA ====================================================== Jitendra Rajwanshi, Son of Late Krishna Rajwanshi, Resident of Village Riula, P.S. Atri, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the first information report. During investigation the spy of the Police named the petitioner. Besides that there is no other legal and tangible material against the petitioner, nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and co-accused Pappu Kumar and Pawan Kumar have been allowed regular bail by the court below itself and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP submits that the petitioner has confessed his guilt and further the petitioner has got criminal history.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29848 of 2017 (2) dt.11-07-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T