Ram Babu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1373 of 2015 =========================================================== Ram Babu .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indu Bhushan For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, AC to GP 5 For the BPSC : Mr.Ranjit Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-04-2018 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the punishment order is in violation of Rule 18 of the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005 inasmuch as the enquiry report was submitted to the extent that the charges against the petitioner was not proved, the Disciplinary authority without differing with the findings of the Enquiry officer has proceeded to inflict the punishment upon the petitioner. State has filed counter affidavit. Respondent authorities by referring to Letter no. 7027 dated 16.5.
2012, though the letter has not been annexed with the counter affidavit, states that the enquiry report was examined meticulously and disagreeing with the same, the Conducting officer had given the reasons of disagreement and the petitioner was asked to submit his representation. This fact has not been disputed by the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1373 of 2015 dt.17-04-2018 2/2 Let the petitioner avail the statutory remedy under Rule 24(2) of the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005 and if such application is filed, respondents would be obliged to consider the same and dispose of by a reasoned and speaking order without raising the issue of delay in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursing the matter before this Court.
The writ petition is thus disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date18.4.2018 Transmission Date NA