Raghunandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13371 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-350 Year-2024 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== Raghunandan Kumar Son of Sanjay Prasad Resident of Village- Kunjaila, P.S.- Roh, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 350 of 2024 dated 23.10.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 338, 319(2), 336(3), 340(2), 111, 61(2) read with section 3 (5) of the B.N.S. and section 66, 66C 66D of the I.T. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, police received secret information about the availability of the petitioner in his house who was the accused of Roh P.S. Case No. 177 of 2024, in the meantime, the police party conducted a raid in the house of the petitioner and apprehended him from there. On search, two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13371 of 2025(2) dt.20-03-2025 2/3 mobile phones along with forged sim cards were recovered. It is further alleged that the petitioner and the other co-accused persons were indulged in the business of Cyber fraud.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that one of the seized mobile phones belongs to the petitioner and another mobile phone was planted by the police party to make him scapegoat in this case. It is further submitted that no one has made any complain against the petitioner regarding any cheating or forgery. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2024 .
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 350
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13371 of 2025(2) dt.20-03-2025 3/3 of 2024, with a condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T