Vikesh Kumar @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14271 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-670 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikesh Kumar @ Vikash Kumar, S/o Lalbachan Rai, R/o Village - Dostiya, P.S - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.670 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 310(6), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111, 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had information that the miscreants have gathered to commit some offence. On this input, search was made and it is alleged that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol, one live cartridge and a mobile were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14271 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. He is languishing in judicial custody since 16.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 670 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T