Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13941 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2022 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== SANJAY YADAV Son of Birjhan Yadav @ Virjhan Yadav Resident of Village- Parari, P.S.- Lauriya, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-06-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2022, for the offence punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 332, 333, 353, 224 and 225 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation made in the F.I.R., a raid was conducted for arresting Bhim Yadav in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 326 of 2021, but, at that time, his family members protested the Police action and they attempted to set free the said Bhim Yadav.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not present at the place of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13941 of 2022(2) dt.15-06-2022 2/3 occurrence. He has been made accused in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 19.01.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13941 of 2022(2) dt.15-06-2022 3/3 of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T